Google wants Oracle’s lawyer to be penalized for revealing its company offer with Apple

Category : Law

Google is still hoping the court will slap Oracle and its lawyer with fines for openly exposing things about Google’s Android business that Google did not wish to expose, reports Ars Technica’s Joe Mullin.In court, Oracle’s lawyers said that Google paid Apple $1 billion in 2014 to keep its search bar on the iPhone. Those statements wound up in a public court transcript, and Bloomberg reported on the number. More information regarding divorce law firm can be found on

Oracle’s lawyers likewise provided various figures on how much money Android makes for Google, at one point reporting that Android has generated $31 billion for Google and $22 billion in earnings.

The two were back in court in May to determine exactly what damages, if any, Google owed Oracle over Google’s use of particular parts of Java in its Android operating system. Oracle was utilizing information it gleaned from Google during the discovery stage of the trial to justify why it thought Google owed it that much money.

The jury decided that Google’s use of Java was covered under the “reasonable use” provision of the copyright law, so Google didn’t owe Oracle anything.

With the trial concluded, Google desires the judge to reassess a motion it submitted in January that said Oracle’s attorneys need to be held responsible for exposing information about its company, reports Mullin. The judge postponed judgment on that till after the trial.

In its initial movement, Google’s attorneys argued:

” Oracle s counsel Annette Hurst just recently disclosed in open court self-serving representations of delicate personal financial information of both Google and third-party Apple Inc., in addition to very private internal Google financial details.”

On top of this, Google is also asking that Oracle be purchased to repay Google for $3.9 million in its legal costs.

Oracle lost the jury trial, the case might not be over. Oracle states it still believes it is in the exactly on the whole situation and plans to appeal.

Buying Africa: looking ahead

Category : Law

This is the sixth and last post in a series by Allen & Overy on vital legal considerations in the life process of an investment in Africa. Simon Toms and James Freeman take a summary of the investment climate from a legal perspective and expect vital legal and regulatory modifications on the horizon.



Prior to taking a look at what may alter, it initially worth considering what is most likely to carry on as previously. Many global financiers think that political risk will continue to be the greatest challenge when investing in Africa, it pervades most kinds of investment. It is a central obstacle in some crucial investment sectors like the extractive markets which necessarily require governmental engagement because sovereign resources are in issue. It is also unavoidable in other sectors such as power, where the scope for feed in tariffs to be varied is a vital risk, and telecoms, where the need to maintain pertinent licenses presents state involvement. The understanding of threat supervisors in studies throughout 15 sub-Saharan nations by Commercial Risk Africa recommended not only that political danger is financier’s greatest concern, however also that political danger was on the increase in 2014 and 2015.

The future of investment treaty security in Africa looks combined. This view has actually led to examples like South Africa, where there is discussion of abandoning investment treaties altogether in favor of offering protection to foreign investments through domestic legislation (which is inferior from the financier’s point of view because the securities can be annulled merely through a modification in domestic law). By contrast, reform, rather than rejection, of the investment treaty design can be seen in (for example) the recently concluded investment treaties in between Canada on the one hand and Benin, Tanzania and Cameroon, which balance the requirements of investment protection with the capability of governments to control in the improvement of public interest.

A second major source of risk for financiers in Africa is corruption. The legal risk from long-arm statutes in the industrialized world like the US FCPA and the UK Bribery Act is popular. There are a variety of examples of corporations being subject to examinations for alleged FCPA infractions in connection with African projects. The risk does not just develop from worldwide legislation, anti-corruption legislation and, significantly, enforcement, is becoming a local matter in Africa. Kenya has actually enacted a number of anti-corruption statutes in the last few years and the brand-new governmental regime in Nigeria is revealing signs of taking corruption seriously. For as long as some prominent African territories keep low ratings in well-recognized procedures like Transparency International s Corruption Perceptions Index, the danger of being ensnared in corrupt activities will continue to be high for negligent foreign financiers.



It is not just a case of more of the exact same for foreign financiers in Africa. In basic terms, the legal environment is enhancing with both legislative and institutional reforms. A few highlights can be identified.

Recent years have actually seen concerted efforts by some nations (Rwanda being perhaps the finest example) to develop a legal program favorable to private investment. Regional coordination of similar aspiration elsewhere in Africa currently looks some method off. Other regional groupings, such as the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA), stay basically customs unions, with regulation other than in matters of trade and investment continuing at a national level.

The courts are fundamental to a predictable and beneficial investment climate. The Doing Business survey concludes that it is harder to impose an agreement through the courts in sub-Saharan Africa relative to other regions. More favorably, courts in sub-Saharan Africa have actually improved much more rapidly than those in other regions.

There is more cross-border and intra-regional co-operation through groups such as the South African Development Community or the 19-nation Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA), which has its own competition regime. There are likewise some careful signs of optimism about the institutional structure for identifying and imposing of intellectual property rights, which has long provided threats and uncertainties as a result of patchy record-keeping and inefficient, paper-based registration treatments. Electronic filing now dominates, for example, in South Africa and Nigeria, and there are two local registration systems for patents and trademarks (OAPI in Western Africa and ARIPO in Southern and Eastern Africa), albeit that their effectiveness can be irregular.


Overall, there are enough reasons to believe that the legal structure for investments in Africa is improving, while recognizing that considerable difficulties remain. This may be one reason that Africa continues to be a centre for growth in the international economy even in the midst of a depression in energy and commodities prices. The quick modifications in the legal and institutional framework are another reason why it is necessary to have strong networks with the local specialists who can navigate the modifications in each of the 54 territories across Africa.

Distinguished Law office Executive L. Howard Belknap Called COO of Butler Snow

Category : Law

Butler Snow is pleased to announce it has actually called experienced law office executive and previous U.S. Army officer L. Howard Belknap chief running officer after an extensive national search.Belknap was formerly with Baker & McKenzie, a leading worldwide law practice where he worked as COO and executive director of the firms New York office. He has more than 30 years of executive leadership and management experience.

Howard has actually been a leader for our nation and a first-class executive who has helped to lead some of the biggest and most effective law firms in the world, said Donald Clark Jr., chairman, Butler Snow. We are enjoyed have him sign up with the Butler Snow team and I anticipate working alongside Howard as we set the vision for our firm and implement our strategic plan.


Belknap earned a bachelor’s degree in engineering from West Point and went on to serve an honorable military profession as an Army officer. He held vital leadership positions, consisting of strategic planner and speechwriter for previous Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Colin Powell, Vice Chief of Staff of the Army J. H. Binford Peay III, and Under Secretary of the Army Joe R. Reeder. He likewise commanded field artillery units in Hawaii and Korea.

After retiring from the Army, Belknap started his law firm career in 2002 as director of administration for the New York office of Shaw Pittman, a 400-attorney firm at the time, where he managed substantial increases in profitability and multi-year company and marketing strategies.

Before signing up with Baker & McKenzie in 2008, he was director of business development of Morgan Lewis. He drove a growth technique for the firm’s company and finance practice group that grew to 450 lawyers representing 17 of the firm s 22 workplaces worldwide.

Throughout his period with Baker & McKenzie, Belknap helped set the vision and long-term New York growth technique for the multi-billion dollar firm with more than 12,000 employees in 77 offices worldwide.

Belknap received a master’s in history and psychology from the University of Michigan and a master s in national security studies from the U.S. Naval War College. He is likewise a graduate of the Center for Creative Leadership’s business leader program.

About Butler Snow

Butler Snow LLP is a full-service law practice with more than 320 lawyers representing local, local, national and international clients from 19 U.S. offices and workplaces in London and Singapore. Ranked as one of America’s Top 100 law office in the BTI Power Rankings, Butler Snow is acknowledged as one of the country’s top law firms for customer service. The firm was just recently ranked 48th from 650 companies in the BTI Client Relationship Scorecard for understanding our customer’s company, preparing for client’s requires, unprompted communication, legal abilities, quality and keeping clients informed.

Find us on Google Plus

Latest Video

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This